The Book Report — A Popular Curse

Hey kids! Welcome back to the Book Report.

At the end of the 19th Century, an Egyptology craze swept through high-society. “Egyptomania” started initially as artifacts from Napoleon’s Egypt campaign were recovered and studied, and by the turn of the century it was very en vogue to be able to discuss things Egyptian.
This fascination naturally found its way into literature.
YouTube Preview Image
In 1827, probably the first mummy story hit the stands, titled The Mummy! Or a Tale of The Twenty-Second Century. It was written by Jane C. Loudon but published anonymously. In the tale, a hideous-looking mummy named Cheops is revived in the 22nd Century and wanders, much like Frankenstein’s Monster, through the world. Unlike the Monster, however, Cheops gives advice and political commentary to any who befriend him. Unlike most Victorian science fiction, Loudon created a vision of the future that was more than just her contemporary England but with some vague political changes. She took current ideas of technology and explored how they might have evolved in 300 years. She even predicted a kind of internet. The novel also gained notice as an early feminist novel, proposing that the women of the future would have more freedoms and even might wear trousers.
Ultimately, the novel worked as political satire and did little to influence the way mummies found their way into ranks of popular horror monsters.

In 1869 Louisa May Alcott wrote Lost in a Pyramid: The Mummy’s Curse, which might be the first example of type of horror story we are looking for. In the story, a lost explorer burns a mummy for light, using the remains as a torch to get out of the tomb. He takes a gold box from the mummy as a souvenier, which contain strange seeds of an unknown plant. The explorer’s fiancee plants one of the seeds and wears the resulting flower on their wedding day. But the seeds carried with them the curse of the mummy, should anyone disturb its rest. The short story ends with the curse settling upon the young bride and the explorer ruing the day he ever disturbed the mummy.

The first story to depict a mummy as a reanimated monster was Lot No. 249, written by Arthur Conan Doyle and published in 1892, but the novel which had probably the most impact on every mummy movie ever made was The Jewel of Seven Stars, written by none other than Bram Stoker 1903. The book received a lot of criticism for its gruesome ending, so Stoker removed the last chapter and rewrote a happier ending in 1912. In 2008, Penguin Classics restored the original ending in its release, and included the revised ending as an appendix.

A great mummy story that I particularly enjoyed came out in 1989, written by Anne Rice. Titled The Mummy, or Ramses the Damned, the book did for mummies what her Vampire Chronicles did for blood-suckers: pulled them out of the gothic story-telling style into the modern era without sacrificing any of the emotional depth of these monsters, yet still able to display their monstrosities.
The story is set in 1914, and within an unusual tomb, archaeologist Lawrence Stratford discovers a mummy that left-behind notes claim is pharaoh Ramses II. The trouble is, the tomb was built in the first century B.C., and Ramses II supposedly died more than 1,000 years prior.

The ensuing story is full of blood and horror and hunger, but at its heart is a love story (much like Dracula). The novel also includes some great fictionalization of Egyptian politics, as well as an interesting take on the Cleopatra-Mark Antony-Julius Caesar love triangle.
It is a ripping good yarn, and though written to stand alone, Anne Rice allowed for sequels. At the end of the novel is the statement, “The adventures of Ramses the Damned shall continue.” Unfortunately (or not, I guess, depending on how you view religion), Anne Rice found a renewed faith in the Catholic Church and turned her writings away from the horror genre to focus on writing “only for the Lord”.
Perhaps someday she’ll be able to reconcile faith with fiction and return to the genre she (along with Stephen King) made so accessible to general readers, and give us a sequel.

That “wraps” up my Report on mummies this week.

Until next time,
Still paddlin’ the old knew…
_-Akatzen-_

6 comments:

  1. DirtyD:

    Excellent.

  2. Joe Pezzula:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/30/anne-rice-i-quit-christia_n_665110.html

  3. Akatzen:

    It’s always nice to see people come to their senses. I guess now we can only hope she returns to the horror genre.

  4. James Ninness:

    Come to her senses?!?

    DISAGREE!

    Lumping Christians in with anti-gay, anti-abortion and anti feminist bigots is hardly “coming to her senses.”

    She could still be a Christian without being any of those things. I’m just as disappointed now as when she said that being Christian meant no more vampire books.

    Get it together Anne. Stop living in doctrinal absolutes created by men, not Christ.

    Sorry. But damn.

  5. Akatzen:

    Well, that’s not really what I meant, though I can see how it could be construed that way. People’s path toward “redemption” or “salvation” (in quotes because it means different things to different people) are never the same, and it always strikes me as nonsensical when someone feels they need to cram themselves into someone else’s box of redemption.
    So realizing that you don’t fit into that box, to me, is coming to your senses. And that’s all I meant.

    Though to be fair, although she over generalizes, there is a lot of anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-feminist sentiment in the Catholic church, much of it endorsed by the pope, which has a hierarchy not present in most other Christian religions.

  6. James Ninness:

    Akatzen,

    Your cool response and level head has “saved” you from an exorbitant amount of midnight teabags.

    I used quotes because I know that based on your moods the lack of teabagging could be construed as punishment.

    Bless you.

Leave a response: