People with a Surplus of Zs and Sheep
Have you ever wondered what would happen if you didn’t sleep? According to WebMD, the
side-effects can be: “decreased performance and alertness, memory and cognitive impairment, stress in relationships, poor quality of life [you feel detached and outside the rest of the world], occupational injury, automobile injury.” Clinically, WebMD attributes this list of wonderfully dire side effects that could emanate from too long away from slumberland: “high blood pressure, heart attack, heart failure, stroke, obesity, psychiatric problems including depression and other mood orders, ADD, mental impairment, fetal and
childhood growth retardation, injury from accidents, disruption of bed partner’s sleep quality, and [again] poor quality of life.” But is this really true? How far have people gone in pushing the limits of sleep and sleep deprivation? Let us explore.
It turns out that there are a couple of people that have gone for the world record of sleeplessness. The person that occurs the most on google searches is a San-Diego based teenager (at the time) from 1964 by the name of Randy Gardner. He went eleven days without sleep. But, if you look at the English news, the man of many sleepless nights is Tony Wright. Both of these cases underwent very stringent recording processes in an attempt to prove that the
person was awake for that entire duration. This seems to be the biggest issue; is the person really awake the whole time. In particular, Tony Wright says some pretty nutty things when it comes to describing how his process of avoiding the sandman took place. A BBC article paraphrases him describing his technique: “He argues that parts of the human brain require a different amount of sleep and it is possible to stay awake and remain functional for long periods.” It is quite possible that he is on to something in that process. The brain may be able to switch to different sides in order to carry out different processes without disturbing other areas of the brain which can then “rest.” There is a fantastic article here from 60 minutes that is really long, but it carries with it a lot of what modern science believes about sleep. Ultimately, the bottom line is that modern science believes that sleep is essential. So let’s go wreck that belief.
There appear to be a couple of encounters throughout history in which people tend to get tremendous amounts of work done by somehow avoiding sleep all together or minimizing it to really, ridiculously low levels. The first case that I was able to trudge up comes from none other than Roger Ebert’s journal. Apparently, when Ebert was out touring the French countryside, he ran across a man whom he discovered did not need to sleep. He was a machinist (and
clockmaker and god knows what else), and he considered sleep to be a secondary death that was performed daily. He writes about his experience (or someone republishes it for him) in this link right here. Though he denied sleeping “not a wink,” his daughter has an addition that is attached to the story that describes his sleeping habits as spastic and at most lasting fifteen minutes perhaps twice a day. Still, half an hour of sleep a day is quite an extraordinary feat if this story is true.
Another story that comes up is from a Vietnamese man named Thai Ngoc, who has apprently not slept for 33 years. He had a fever at one point and now, he does not sleep at all. He claims that he is still healthy (after all he is now 64) and he is still able to heft two 50 kg. bags down 4 kilometers of road (!?) If this is true, this is quite possibly the most bad-ass farmer dude that ever walked around. The unfortunate part is that the man seems to really resent the fact that he can not get even the slightest bit of sleep. He is a poor farmer, so I can’t really imagine that he has an X-Box to keep him busy at night, or anything of the ilk. But the case is interesting in that a fever appears to be the cause of his lack of sleep. Now, I am stretching quite a bit here, but is it possible that some microbe when correctly combined with human DNA awakens the ability in a person to overcome sleep? If so, would it be worth harvesting? Incorporating? Could you all use several extra hour’s productivity? Or would work forces then just make the word day 16 hours long? Questions for contemplation, I suppose.
Leonardo DiVinci is a person that apprently slept a total of two hours a night. He was alleged to take fifteen to twenty minute cat naps (or power naps to some) every four hours he was awake or so. Also in that line of sleep patterns are Thomas Edison, Thomas Jefferson, and Nikola Tesla. Now, these are commonly accepted work-a-holics, and the doubt that I can cast on their credibility lies solely in the fact that this information comes from journals that benefit with the promotion of a tireless American work-ethic. Other than that, they may in deed be very true. The missing detail in these men is how they were able to achieve this effect. The Vietnamese guy at least underwent a fever that seems to have transformed him. Were the above men effected by the same virus? Did they share the symptoms of the same disease? They were both reputed to follow a similar sleep regiment. Some ancient Kung-Fu and modern Tai’Chi practiconers were said to be able to get away with as little as two two-hour naps during the evening and early morning. It is also possible that they were able to achieve a sleep like state without administering any outward sign which scientists call “microsleeping.” In other words, it is possible that while you were blathering to them about something important, they were dozing and dreaming in a very short space. So what is the verdict? Why is it that some people need to get sleep or else suffer dire consequences and some people crave sleep but do not need it at all? From the information I am picking up, it seems that it is a combination of genetics and biology. There does seem to be some group of people that try different sleep schedules to boost certain performances. But ultimately, I still feel that the amount of sleep we need is specific to an individual.





